I know that Lemmy is open source and it can only get better from here on out, but I do wonder if any experts can weigh in whether the foundation is well written? Or are we building on top of 4 years worth of tech debt?

  • platypus_plumba
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is a discussion I’m also interested in. Migrating a monolith to microservices is a big decision that can have serious performance, maintainability and development impact.

    Microservices can be very complex and hard to maintain compared to a monolith. Just the deployment and monitoring could turn into a hassle for instance maintainers. Ease of deployment and maintenance is a big deal in a federated environment. Add too much complexity and people won’t want to be part of it.

    I’ve seen some teams do hybrids. Like allowing the codebase to be a single artifact or allowing it to be broken by functionalities. That way people can deploy it the easy way or the performant way, as their needs change.

    • BURN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s what I’m thinking. Microservices could be a huge pain in the ass, but a hybrid approach would make things much better. Smaller instances wouldn’t be a problem, but the larger instances would be able to separate out components.

      To keep it possible to run monolithicly would probably need a lot of work, but it’s possible to do and would probably be the best approach.

    • boeman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gitlab is a great example of a piece of software that has multiple deployment strategies like that.