• merc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s weird how some of these futurists got some of the details right (viewing news on the TV) while missing the obvious (being able to read / select / zoom-in on one article).

    Can you imagine how awful it would be to project a newspaper’s front page 1:1 on a TV, then try to read it? Even with a 4k TV the text would be small, and there’s no way you could read it from the couch.

    • joeyv120@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t have to imagine. I was there 3000 years ago. In the early days of the web they saved entire newspaper pages (as printed!) as single image files. You’d have to zoom in and pan around the page to read it. It was absolutely painful.

    • mindbleach
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, who’d read text on a screen from that close?

      • merc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not so much reading text on a screen, it’s more looking at the entire front page of the newspaper, rather than choosing and reading individual stories.

    • jasondj@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I use a 4k television as a monitor for my daily driver. 43” LG UQ8000. So it has 4:4:4 and 60fps at 4k so long as the host supports it over HDMI 2.0. And it’s barely usable at 4k if they don’t, between the lag and the sub pixels, it’s honestly a better experience at 1080p or 1440p cropped.

      With 4k, 444, and 60fps, though, It’s not that bad, even without font scaling, except for certain regions due to the contrast ratio/glare (which isn’t that bad, and I’m not trying to limit the glare, either) or due to viewing angle, being so close.

      It’s not the highest quality, but it’s a serviceable way for me to have an 8.3 megapixel desktop, and it was like $300 so I’m happy.

      Granted it’s also on a standing desk, so I’m pretty close and can get back a little while still being comfortable too.

    • plantedworld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I remember hooking my desktop up to a large CRT TV to play StarCraft via composite cables with an adapter. But the resolution didn’t work. You couldn’t read shit. Could play but not chat with my friends