• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    0
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    There’s no way they would do that since climate change is a “tradegy of the commons” problem.

    The tragedy of the commons is a metaphoric label for a concept that is widely discussed in economics, ecology and other sciences. According to the concept, should a number of people enjoy unfettered access to a finite, valuable resource such as a pasture, they will tend to over-use it, and may end up destroying its value altogether. To exercise voluntary restraint is not a rational choice for individuals – if they did, the other users would merely supplant them – yet the predictable result is a tragedy for all.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons

    Currently, every country seeks to maximize the emissions that they are still allowed to have without being penalized (internationally, and by their own population).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      29 months ago

      The US landed men on the moon to show the Soviets who has the better technology. All countries have already agreed that climate change is not only a problem, but that emissions have to be lowered in the Paris Agreement. Soft power is real power, so a race towards zero emissions is entirly possible. Also there are other reasons for doing it too. Right now the US has a political disliking of Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Venezuela and many other large oil producers. All of them would be weakend by the US lowering its own oil consumption too.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        Unfortunately, the US decided to go the other direction and become a major oil producer in the last twenty years for the very reason you mention.