The Supreme Court said Wednesday it will consider whether to restrict access to a widely used abortion drug — even in states where the procedure is still allowed.

The case concerns the drug mifepristone that — when coupled with another drug — is one of the most common abortion methods in the United States.

The decision means the conservative-leaning court will again wade into the abortion debate after overturning Roe v. Wade last year, altering the landscape of abortion rights nationwide and triggering more than half the states to outlaw or severely restrict the procedure.

  • @mindbleach
    link
    6
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Hell, I mean authorities themselves should ignore these bastards. ‘Oh, but precedent…’ fuck that noise, we know this is nonsense. State courts should say this is garbage. City courts should say this is garbage. Employees, bosses, and shareholders alike should say this is garbage. No anarchist bent is required to say: we choose to do this; we can choose something else.

    We are already in a crisis of institutions. Stop doing what’s normal, and just do what’s right.

    • tygerprints
      link
      fedilink
      36 months ago

      I totally agree. I don’t think it’s anarchist to question this (or any) groups’ so called “moral authority” over the rest of us. I think its necessary. These people are supposed to represent US, the little people of the country, not their own moral ideas of what is right and wrong - they’re supposed to represent US. Not anything else!! And most people disagree totally with their overturning of Roe Vs. Wade, which was sick and immoral as anything could ever be.