• sugar_in_your_tea
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    That still sounds like a special type of third person, though I guess that’s just disagreeing about terminology.

    • lugal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I see why you would analyze it that way but I also see that it deserves a term in its own rights. As you said, it’s all terminology. There are no objective definitions, at least not in linguistics