• @pelespirit
    link
    385 months ago

    It does say he’s not eligible and the feds won’t do it, now it’s left up to the states.

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      fedilink
      English
      365 months ago

      the feds won’t do it because the feds don’t run elections. Every state decides whose on the ballot. It’s literally not the fed’s job to do it, and never was

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          fedilink
          English
          95 months ago

          the constitution only says he’s ineligible. It doesn’t say how to deal with that. It’s left it to the states to figure that out on their own.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                6
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Interesting thought. So in any state that includes Trump on the ballot, a party should put forward a 30-year-old (legal) recent immigrant as a presidential candidate. Either they would need to put the candidate on the ballot whether they are ineligible or not, or remove Trump (or be shown for their double standard).

      • @pelespirit
        link
        15 months ago

        Meaning SCOTUS won’t say if he’s ineligible or not.

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          For the primary ballot? Certainly not. It’s not their purview. And in any case they’ve only got a few days to make that determination- many states are rapidly closing in on when the ballots need to be finalized so they can be printed and distributed.

          Most likely, SCROTUS is waiting until after the regular election to see if such a ruling is even necessary.