Did you even glance at this before posting? It’s titled “games that treat GoG as second class citizens”. Not “GoG treats customers as second class citizens”.
That’s a title. Gosh people really are GoG fanboys.
GoG always claimed that they hand-pick only quality games, that they personally negotiate with game companies, etc.
If a game treats gog customers as second class citizens, it means that GoG allows it. The existence of this link on the gog website also means that GoG is aware of it and doesn’t give a shit.
The first page contains a google doc summarizing all the issues that were reported.
I called you a fanboy for attacking what I said out of superficial points that proved you didn’t bother reading what I linked, all it would have taken was to read the first post.
GoG advertises hand-picked, high quality games (or at least did) so they’re the ones claiming to have the ability to select.
This post is enough for anyone in the gog team to contact the companies of the concerned games and discuss those issues. Pretty easy fix if you ask me.
The first page contains a google doc summarizing all the issues that were reported.
Irrelevant issues.
I called you a fanboy for attacking what I said out of superficial points that proved you didn’t bother reading what I linked
Because they’re irrelevant.
This post is enough for anyone in the gog team to contact the companies of the concerned games and discuss those issues. Pretty easy fix if you ask me.
Well the people reporting these issues don’t seem to think they’re irrelevant. You do sound like quite a fanboy, frankly.
If they have done that, then they didn’t fix anything and didn’t do their job. On the contrary, new games being published on GoG have more of the same kind of issues. You’re just defending GoG irrationally.
Did you even glance at this before posting? It’s titled “games that treat GoG as second class citizens”. Not “GoG treats customers as second class citizens”.
That’s a title. Gosh people really are GoG fanboys.
GoG always claimed that they hand-pick only quality games, that they personally negotiate with game companies, etc.
If a game treats gog customers as second class citizens, it means that GoG allows it. The existence of this link on the gog website also means that GoG is aware of it and doesn’t give a shit.
And that was just one example.
Titles are typically indicative of the content of the post…
Do you want to provide evidence that isn’t literally just a link to 200 pages of irrelevant user comments?
So you provide irrelevant evidence and that makes me a fanboy? Okay sure.
Is that so? What is it that you expect them to do about this?
The first page contains a google doc summarizing all the issues that were reported.
I called you a fanboy for attacking what I said out of superficial points that proved you didn’t bother reading what I linked, all it would have taken was to read the first post.
GoG advertises hand-picked, high quality games (or at least did) so they’re the ones claiming to have the ability to select. This post is enough for anyone in the gog team to contact the companies of the concerned games and discuss those issues. Pretty easy fix if you ask me.
Irrelevant issues.
Because they’re irrelevant.
And what makes you think they haven’t done that?
Well the people reporting these issues don’t seem to think they’re irrelevant. You do sound like quite a fanboy, frankly.
If they have done that, then they didn’t fix anything and didn’t do their job. On the contrary, new games being published on GoG have more of the same kind of issues. You’re just defending GoG irrationally.