Original toot in Spanish says: “OK, so I need some alternatives to Google Maps, because I just decided seconds ago to stop using it after I got proposed a trip with a completely unnecessary detour which adds two extra minutes just because it pass by a gas station that sponsors this trip.”

  • merc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    184
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    The picture suggests that there was an ad that suggested a stop at the sponsored gas station, if the user clicked on the suggestion / ad, then the route would be modified.

    IMO that’s massively different than the detour being added by default. If they actually did / were doing that, it would be a huge scandal, but I don’t think that’s what’s happening here. Instead, it’s just an intrusive, annoying ad.

      • merc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        64
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Damn monetization of *checks notes* Mastodon and Lemmy! Those communists are ruining everything!

      • elfioOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, about 0% richer now compared with yesterday.

        • wkk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re right that this is not generating monetary gains

          But it’s generating outrage towards Google when what you accuse them of doing isn’t the reality, that’s pretty disingenuous

          Not defending Google as a whole, but let’s keep honest about the current developments

          The day sponsored trips are the default is the day I’m dropping Maps

          • elfioOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I see your point. I wanted to rely what someone else thought was interesting to share.

            I’ve been tuning the title as other people here suggested improvements to it.

            Apart from that, I didn’t see the advert/proposed alternative route nor put the ad in there, so I never will be able to reflect the absolute truth. However, echoing this other person experience might lead to others being aware of the possibility. I’d be interested to know if someone else sees something similar.

    • elfioOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Might be. It’s indeed hard to tell by the picture, but the user seems to knows the place so I don’t know. What seems about right is the title is misleading so I’m going to change it.

      • criticon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        The picture shows the “eco” route which is a setting you can turn on/off that selects gas saving routes even if they add some minutes to the trip

      • wkk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Please change “added a sponsored detour” to “proposed a sponsored detour” and it won’t be as misleading anymore