Picture Pig to [email protected] • 6 months agoLet's go! (sorry i used WSL i have my own reasons for it...)lemmy.worldimagemessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up1187arrow-down125
arrow-up1162arrow-down1imageLet's go! (sorry i used WSL i have my own reasons for it...)lemmy.worldPicture Pig to [email protected] • 6 months agomessage-square36fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•6 months agoBetter in which way? WSL2 is a VM running ALONGSIDE Windows, not inside. Its performance is basically bare metal. If you have enough RAM, there is no reason to use cygwin instead of WSL2.
minus-squarePossibly linuxlinkfedilinkEnglish-1•6 months agoIn that case why don’t you just run a VM or install bare metal. WSL strips you of control just like Windows itself does.
minus-squarePicture PigOPlinkfedilink1•6 months agoits complicated as i replied to someone else’s comment… im not a “it just works” user too but its complicated to explain why i use windows for now (but ill switich soon) like im totally a FOSS enthusiast but like…
Better in which way? WSL2 is a VM running ALONGSIDE Windows, not inside. Its performance is basically bare metal. If you have enough RAM, there is no reason to use cygwin instead of WSL2.
its complicated please dont blame me for WSL
In that case why don’t you just run a VM or install bare metal. WSL strips you of control just like Windows itself does.
its complicated as i replied to someone else’s comment…
im not a “it just works” user too but its complicated to explain why i use windows for now (but ill switich soon)
like im totally a FOSS enthusiast but like…