Meta/Instagram launched a new product called Threads today (working title project92). It adds a new interface for creating text posts and replying to them, using your Instagram account. Of note, Meta has stated that Threads plans to support ActivityPub in the future, and allow federation with ActivityPub services. If you actually look at your Threads profile page in the app your username has a threads.net tag next to it - presumably to support future federation.

Per the link, a number of fediverse communities are pledging to block any Meta-directed instances that should exist in the future. Thus instance content would not be federated to Meta instances, and Meta users would not be able to interact with instance content.

I’m curious what the opinions on this here are. I personally feel like Meta has shown time and time again that they are not very good citizens of the Internet; beyond concerns of an Eternal September triggered by federated Instagram, I worry that bringing their massive userbase to the fediverse would allow them to influence it to negative effect.
I also understand how that could be seen to go against the point of federated social media in the first place, and I’m eager to hear more opinions. What do you think?

  • RedComet91
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s because companies like Meta want all the power they can get. As you said, there’s no reason for them to join the fediverse, other than to control it or kill it off, that is.

    I’m not against Threads existing, especially with the way Twitter is going. People need an alternative and I don’t believe that Mastodon is the answer for many.

    But Threads and the fediverse can absolutely exist separately, and is why I support defederation.