Hello frens,

As a great opponent of any form of IP, I have been following the event of Disney’s Steamboat Willie entering the public domain with great amusement. The incidents where creators have been falsely demonetized on youtube for rightfully using this film is further underpinned by Disney’s decades-long shameless practices. The linked article sums it up quite well I think.

  • mindbleach
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    11 months ago

    Thirty years from publication.

    No exceptions.

    Copyright is only an incentive to create new works for the public. For us. Once you’ve sold it, it’s ours. That’s what the money is for. If thirty years isn’t enough then it’s just not gonna happen.

    People have a right to culture. Anything you grew up with is yours to build on.

    • merc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Thirty years from publication.

      The original was 14 years renewable for another 14. I like that better. It means that abandonware goes into the public domain faster, but it’s easy to renew a copyright if it’s still being used.

      No exceptions.

      I disagree. Exceptions for sports and software: shorter. Sports is most relevant when it’s live, and copyright-holders for sports content are much more vicious when it comes to taking down tiny clips of goals or something. So, make a special category that gives them extra protection when it comes to tiny clips in exchange for much shorter copyright terms. For software, it’s essential to be able to maintain old equipment, especially old industrial equipment. That soft of software could be used in power plants, medical equipment, water purification plants, etc. Companies are notoriously bad at keeping that stuff safe especially decades later. Instead, make it public domain faster.

      • mindbleach
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Copyright should be irrelevant immediately, for most of that.

        Someone modifying software you sold them is not a pirate. Licenses mean nothing.

        Someone sharing a game you stopped selling is a pirate, but if you don’t want money, who cares?

        Someone sharing clips of old sports games is not competing with your live broadcast business.

        Intellectual property laws don’t need to be brief, to be sane. Most things that rights-cartels freak out over are downright stupid. We can give them what they need without tolerating their every paranoid want. These laws only exist to benefit us.

        Simplicity is useful here. I’m willing to spot people a nice round number for ample opportunity to sell their thing. Especially if it means the date on the cover is a guarantee.