Blame financial blunders and timid regulation, not privatisation

  • Bernie Ecclestoned
    link
    21 year ago

    The difference with electricity is that I can change provider without having to move house

    There is no competition between water or train companies

    • theinspectorstOP
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Trains are different. There isn’t market competition between the Train Operating Companies (TOCs) so they created a system of pre-market competition when they privatised them - the competition takes place when TOCs bid against each other in the auction for the local franchises every five (I think?) years.

      The bit of the rail network over which it’s much harder to introduce competition is the actual railways themselves - which is partly why the railways were renationalised by Labour in 2002.

      Water companies don’t/can’t compete against each other though - that’s the reason even the Thatcher government thought it was necessary to give us a system of price cap regulation in order for them to operate privately. But as I’ve said above, the problem with water isn’t monopolistic pricing, it’s underinvestment, which wouldn’t obviously be solved under public ownership either.

      • Bernie Ecclestoned
        link
        21 year ago

        Yep, which is why Spain’s inflation rate has fallen so quickly because they unlinked the gas price from electricity

        There is competition between electricity firms on price, unlike water though.

        But, the same principle doesn’t apply with trains. You can’t have multiple train opcos on the same route, it should be nationalised.