Today, I noticed that Google wasn’t loading on Mull (Firefox Fork). Switching useragent with the extension Chameleon makes the page load again.

  • @itmosi
    link
    136 months ago

    Yep, with Mull 121.0.0 i got a blank page.

      • @itmosi
        link
        86 months ago

        Nothing special, Mozilla/5.0 (Android 10; Mobile; rv:121.0) Gecko/121.0 Firefox/121.0. I checked the network tab, they literally return nothing.

        • mo_ztt ✅
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Mozilla/5.0 (Android 10; Mobile; rv:121.0) Gecko/121.0 Firefox/121.0.

          I just did a bunch of testing. The issue is that final version number, “Firefox/121.0”. Google returns very different versions of the page based on what browser you claim to be, and if you’re on mobile Firefox, it gives you different mobile versions depending on your version:

          % wget -O - -nv -U 'Mozilla/5.0 (Android 10; Mobile; rv:62.0) Gecko/121.0 Firefox/41.0' https://www.google.com/ | wc -c
          2024-01-08 15:54:29 URL:https://www.google.com/ [1985] -> "-" [1]
              1985
          % wget -O - -nv -U 'Mozilla/5.0 (Android 10; Mobile; rv:62.0) Gecko/121.0 Firefox/62.0' https://www.google.com/ | wc -c
          2024-01-08 15:54:36 URL:https://www.google.com/ [211455] -> "-" [1]
            211455
          % wget -O - -nv -U 'Mozilla/5.0 (Android 10; Mobile; rv:62.0) Gecko/121.0 Firefox/80.0' https://www.google.com/ | wc -c
          2024-01-08 15:52:24 URL:https://www.google.com/ [15] -> "-" [1]
                15
          % wget -O - -nv -U 'Mozilla/5.0 (Android 10; Mobile; rv:62.0) Gecko/121.0 Firefox/121.0' https://www.google.com/ | wc -c
          2024-01-08 15:52:04 URL:https://www.google.com/ [15] -> "-" [1]
                15
          

          If you’re an early version of Firefox, it gives you a simple page. If you’re a later version of Firefox, it gives you a lot more complete version of the page. If you’re claiming to be a specific version of mobile Firefox, but the version you’re claiming (edit: oopsie doesn’t exist or even really make sense didn’t exist when they set this logic up or something), it gets confused and gives you nothing. You could argue that it should default to some sensible mobile version in this case, and they should definitely fix it, but it seems to me like it’s clearly not malicious.

          Edit: Wait, I am wrong. I didn’t realize Firefox’s version numbers went up so high. It looks like the cutoff for where the blank pages start coming is at version 65, which is like 2012 era, so not real old at all. I still maintain that it’s probably accidental but it looks like it affects basically all modern mobile Firefoxes, yes.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            146 months ago

            Given that it’s like third accidental bug in google services that affects only Firefox in the last month I hear about, I’m starting to get suspicious.

          • Vincent AdultmanOP
            link
            fedilink
            16 months ago

            Thanks for the tests. They make the information more reliable since I had extensions turned on.