• Peppycito
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    The starlink constellation is-

    Nearly 12,000 satellites are planned to be deployed, with a possible later extension to 42,000.

    If they last 5 years that’s 2400-8400 deorbiting per year. These aren’t the ones “answering the mysteries of the universe” these are the ones selling internet access.

    From the article-

    plunge through the atmosphere and disintegrate, leaving a stream of pollutants in their wake. Although scientists do not yet know how this will influence Earth’s environment, Dr. Ross thinks that it will be the most significant impact from spaceflight.

    • xor
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      well i was contrasting how say, the hubble telescope is a worthwhile satellite that will eventually burn up in the atmosphere, while starlink is wasteful…

      • Peppycito
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Hubble is so far away it won’t reenter for a very long time. And that’s 1 versus 12000.

        • xor
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          what is your point?
          my point is you’re agreeing with me a lot but misinterpreting me entirely… so you’re trying to argue with me.

          i’ll repeat my point reeeeeally simply:
          yes, starlink wasteful, bad satellites.
          some satellites good, like hubble.