Vancouver geography is not that constrained. Land use is just very bad. The classic Vancouver skyline is a surprisingly small area. It’s surrounded by SFH suburbs. The Lower Mainland has tons of strip malls and parking lots due to car culture. It’s not a lack of land, it’s a bad use of land.
BC Lower mainland: 36,000 km^2. Population 3 million.
Netherlands: 41,500 km^2. Population 17 million.
Belgium: 30,500 km^2. Population 11.7 million.
Switzerland: 41,250 km^2. Population 8.7 million.
These countries are not Hong Kong. They have nature, a mix of big cities and small towns, and lots of low density areas. Switzerland is a famously mountainous region with lots of untouched nature and rural areas.
ah, I see what you mean now. Yes, Vancouver is MUCH more dense than Calgary. But Calgary isn’t just sprawling, they also deliberately planned for more housing supply throughout the city, including more density. Vancouver and the LM have not implemented such a plan.
Vancouver geography is not that constrained. Land use is just very bad. The classic Vancouver skyline is a surprisingly small area. It’s surrounded by SFH suburbs. The Lower Mainland has tons of strip malls and parking lots due to car culture. It’s not a lack of land, it’s a bad use of land.
These countries are not Hong Kong. They have nature, a mix of big cities and small towns, and lots of low density areas. Switzerland is a famously mountainous region with lots of untouched nature and rural areas.
Compared to Calgary?
ah, I see what you mean now. Yes, Vancouver is MUCH more dense than Calgary. But Calgary isn’t just sprawling, they also deliberately planned for more housing supply throughout the city, including more density. Vancouver and the LM have not implemented such a plan.