I’m politically agnostic and have moved from a slightly conservative stance to a vastly more progressive stance (european). i still dont get the more niche things like tankies and anarchists at this point but I would like to, without spending 10 hours reading endless manifests (which do have merit, no doubt, but still).

Can someone explain to me why anarchy isnt the guy (or gal, or gang, or entity) with the bigger stick making the rules?

  • merc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    IMO it’s more important to talk about the specific elements of the system, because all the successful systems have used mixes of other systems.