• Gooey0210
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    Warden is on Izzydroid, alternative fdroid repository

    It wants root so it can disable trackers

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s reasonable for an app like this to need root, but also reasonable for everyone to ask for third-party verification of anything they’re granting administrative access to their devices.

      Izzydroid’s security policy appears to be primarily based around automated scans that enumerate badness, and has far fewer users than the official F-Droid repository making it less likely that problems will be noticed, reported, and acted on.

      Is there more reputation information about this app available?

      • Gooey0210
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It’s from the same devs of aurora store, aurora droid

        And really, so much talking and scepticism around a free and open source app, you can go and check the source, or at least read a review about it (though the app wasn’t update

        OP is recommending a cool app to spark a conversation, but all the replies are just complaints

        Cool people made a cool app, cool people are hosting an alternative fdroid repo so it’s easier and faster for devs to publish their projects for the world to see, and cool people found this app and decided to share with other people

        But those people are just behaving like boomers and saying that everything around is fake, dangerous, and so on

        If somebody cares for security, why would that person even have root in the first place, same with fdroid, if you care for security you shouldn’t use fdroid

        Sorry if i’m being to rough, everything i said is not really addressed to you, i’m just being pissed by people not appreciating somebody’s will to start a nice conversation

        P.s. the last update of this app was like 3 years ago, if somebody cares for security, they should never install an app that old, it’s not even about root or some policies

        • Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m not complaining. I’m asking for some evidence this app is trustworthy.

          Security is not binary. Having root can be bad for security, but it doesn’t have to be especially if you’re careful about what apps you grant root to, which is the point of my original comment. Having root can also be a security benefit because it offers more opportunities for detecting and blocking harmful and privacy-invasive apps, as this app does (if it’s trustworthy).

          I don’t think F-Droid with the official repositories is a negative for security either; I suspect it’s less likely to contain outright malware than Google Play, and I’m sure the average app on F-Droid is less likely to be privacy-invasive. Adding random repositories suggested by strangers on the internet can be a different story, and asking who can vouch for the one suggested in this thread seems like a reasonable mitigation to me.

          • Gooey0210
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            My last comment wasn’t really addressed personally to you, sorry i sounded like that

            Having root is almost never a security benefit, it allows you to close one hole, but opens up 10 new more

            It means you have your bootloader unlocked, you have secure boot disabled which allows for persistent malware. Just having root by itself opens up many more remote, zero click, or just very dangerous exploits

            F-droid is not secure, some of the issues had been resolved, but it’s still not recommended for best practices

            Of course, everything depends on the thread model

            I personally really like fdroid and izzy, and other custom repos. And root is a cool thing, although i don’t have it on my daily driver(but have on my test phone)

            • Zak@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              There may be some other comments being unfair. People shouldn’t complain about free software someone else gives to them falling short of perfection, but we should be careful about granting random apps root permissions.

              Having root is almost never a security benefit, it allows you to close one hole, but opens up 10 new more

              I think it’s more like two:

              • If an app granted root privileges is compromised, the damage it can cause is much greater
              • The bootloader has to be unlocked for most approaches to gaining root; I consider it a design flaw that it isn’t easier for users to add signing keys and re-lock the bootloader

              F-droid is not secure, some of the issues had been resolved, but it’s still not recommended for best practices

              This is another very binary statement about security. The article addresses a number of design issues with F-Droid and concludes that most users are better off getting apps from Google Play. I don’t disagree with the design complaints in theory, but in practice it doesn’t hold up. I’ve seen people get malware from Google Play and read a number of documented cases. I have never heard of malware in the official F-Droid repository.

              I’m reminded of comparing Windows to Linux 20 years ago. In theory, Windows had a more sophisticated permissions model and more reliable logging, making it potentially more secure. In practice, it took significant care to keep a Windows desktop clean, while Linux was very unlikely to be compromised.

              Of course someone with high-value secrets on their device or who’s likely to be directly targeted by sophisticated threats should probably take a more conservative approach, install very few apps, and consider a hardened ROM like GrapheneOS.

              • Gooey0210
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Agree, agree, agree

                But have some sidenotes to add 😂

                The bootloader has to be unlocked for most approaches to gaining root;

                Did you know you can root grapheneos, and lock the bootloader? 😂 pretty dangerous stuff to do, but possible!

                concludes that most users are better off getting apps from Google Play.

                In general, screw google play, and screw google, or any big corpo, it’s not even about security, but about them being bad companies and bad services

                And the same about windows, joy is the most important thing, if software is full of trackers and just designed poorly, why would anyone want to use it 🫠

                • Zak@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I did not know that it was possible to have root on GrapheneOS with a locked bootloader, but there have been ROMs with SU functionality built in, and adding their keys would be a straightforward way to have root and a locked bootloader.