• the post of tom joad
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No, but you do need to take a deep breath, because you’re talking a lot more than you’re saying in anger.

    Dont be angry at me for telling you this, that’s not why I’m saying it. I’m saying it because i believe that anger is causing you to lose your objectivity.

    And please, take one more breath if you’re planning another diatribe… the whole point of my initial comment, to say we “shouldnt give in to the urge to dehumanize our opponents”. Isnt an invitation for you to demonstrate precisely what i just said not to do.

    • abraxas
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not angry right now. I’m just telling it like it is to me.

      Please be careful not to think you read emotions into comments when they might not be there.

      • the post of tom joad
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Please be careful not to think you read emotions into comments when they might not be there.

        Alright, i read you wrong, i apologize

        • abraxas
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s ok. It’s so common that companies teach classes on interpreting (or not over-interpreting) emotion into email. It’s one of multiple reasons people often get into heated arguments on the interrnet when they would not in person.