• ricecake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t know that there’s a better model either, but I’m very confident that we vastly overvalue investors in our current setup.
    In an ideal society, I think workers would be compensated for the value they produce not the value they’ll accept, and that’s just incompatible with a society that structurally predisposed to value investment above labor.

    I don’t think there’s a quick or easy path to get there, but in the meantime I’m aggressively unsympathetic to investor class woes.

    In terms of nationalization for the common good, I’m generally referring to things like Amtrak or the TSA. There’s a fair value that can be assessed largely independently of any market value.

    • PsychedSy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      In my ideal society we’d take care of each other.

      Don’t use the TSA as a fucking model. Shit.

      In an ideal society, I think workers would be compensated for the value they produce not the value they’ll accept, and that’s just incompatible with a society that structurally predisposed to value investment above labor.

      How do you feel about compensation for shit like QA at peeps like boeing? Lots of us don’t ‘produce’ but we’re huge into it.

      • ricecake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m not pedantic about “production” being actual literal “fabrication”, but just a contrast to “rent seeking” or “investment”.

        • PsychedSy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Fair enough. Thanks for the conversation.