I’m sure these freak events really happened, but it seems irresponsib(ru)le to make people feel like this might happen to them, just for views

Update: I have hidden channel names in the interest of letting people know this is criticizing the tr(ul)end, and not any specific YouTubers

Edit: If you’re here to discuss any particular YouTuber, please scroll down. I’ve already had this discussion, and I have nothing more to consider or add regarding this derailment. I’ve fixed the problem by posting an edited image. Thank you so much!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    145 months ago

    In what way is that title clickbait? He describes a medical emergency where some is licked by a dog and the person’s organs shut down. I don’t know how else to formulate a title like that. He also consistently uses the same format for all his titles, which I feel are very descriptive and a point of recognition for his channel.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      75 months ago

      Man dies after eating chicken tenders! Woman loses her child to cat litter! Elderly man foreskin amputated after drinking monster!

      A clickbait title consists of two nouns and a verb. The first noun and verb are the subject and context of what happened. The third noun is to draw a connect and get you to ask “What/Why?” It iffers no true insight and exists purely to get you to click. These match that criteria.

      • @Ookami38
        link
        75 months ago

        If those things all directly led to the death, they’re perfectly fine titles. Titles include a vague description, and yeah… if someone ate a tendie, or as is the style of these videos, likely 300 tendies, it’s not clickBAIT. It’s just a title. Bait implies there’s something insincere.

        If a dog licked a guy, and then he went out and got shot, sure don’t tell me the dog lick killed him, but if it’s anything that specifically comes from the lick, man, it’s fair enough.