Jack Ryan S3 E3

  • @mindbleach
    link
    English
    145 months ago

    it still looks near original.

    Presumably you know, but for anyone else: the word for this is “transparent.” It’s when the codec leaves no noticeable artifacts.

    • kellyaster
      link
      fedilink
      45 months ago

      Huh, there’s a term for that? TIL

      Y’know, there’s a similar one used in the gemstone industry: “eye clean,” which only applies if the stone has no inclusions (artifacts) that can be seen with the naked eye. As you can imagine, it’s usually a pretty desirable trait, especially in diamonds. It doesn’t really matter if there’s random garbage floating around in it, it just has to be undetectable to our human eyes.

      • @mindbleach
        link
        English
        35 months ago

        Misread as “gaming industry” and was briefly very confused.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      How would you use that in a sentence? Like “You can compress the hell out of the video and it’s transparent”?

      • @mindbleach
        link
        English
        55 months ago

        You’d describe the encoding, not the source. The fun part is that it also applies to audio. “At 256 kbps, MP3 is transparent.”

        It only applies to lossy codecs. Lossless codecs, by definition, have no error. “Error” itself being a borrowed term. Good encodings don’t have fewer errors… they have less error. For example, measured as mean squared error, where an individual sample being very wrong counts more than many samples being slightly wrong.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      Yeah, from the re-encodes I’ve done, I only noticed artifacts in clouds and the New Line Cinema intro to lord of the Rings