@[email protected] to [email protected] • edit-25 months agoIt’s time to admit that genes are not the blueprint for lifewww.nature.comexternal-linkmessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1154arrow-down135file-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1119arrow-down1external-linkIt’s time to admit that genes are not the blueprint for lifewww.nature.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • edit-25 months agomessage-square77fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
Review of 2023 book: How Life Works: A User’s Guide to the New Biology Philip Ball. ISBN9781529095999
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•5 months agoSo, shall we call it “inactive regions” then?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•5 months agoNo, because they are anything other than inactive
So, shall we call it “inactive regions” then?
‘Noncoding region’ seems to be the preferred term.
No, because they are anything other than inactive