• IrateAnteater
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yes. We have all agreed to exchange tokens (which have little to no inherent value) for goods and services, in lieu of trading other goods and services directly.

    All other mechanics surrounding money are up for debate, but for any society more advanced than the hunter-gatherer stage, some form of “money” is required to facilitate trade.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Why? Library economies are moneyless, and highly adaptive to technological progression and climate change.

          • drphungky@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Who makes the consumables in a library economy? Why on earth would I farm for love of the game?

              • drphungky@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Someone else will do it then, surely? I can just play video games and check things out permanently from the library and get free food from the farmer?

                • bane_killgrind@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Maybe if you want to piss off the farmer…

                  You are forgetting that there is a component of anonymity that fiat currency provides transactions. You lose that in a social economy.

                  Money is “asocial”.