Surprise!!

  • HopeOfTheGunblade
    link
    fedilink
    95 months ago

    Okay but that already happened. There’s another case determining the part about whether he goes to jail for it, but that he is an insurrectionist per the amendment is already resolved.

    • @Corkyskog
      link
      35 months ago

      Which case was that which already happened?

      • HopeOfTheGunblade
        link
        fedilink
        85 months ago

        The one being relitigated here before the SC. Lowest court ruled that he was an insurrectionist, second tier ruled that president is in fact an office and that the oath for it applies.

    • blazera
      link
      fedilink
      -15 months ago

      It’s not resolved, this is the same case, a higher court can overrule their decision. It was never their jurisdiction to decide if he committed federal crimes.

      • HopeOfTheGunblade
        link
        fedilink
        35 months ago

        Right. It was their jurisdiction to decide if he was an insurrectionist per the amendment. They did, he is. Federal crimes is a different case. Just like the recent defamation case ruled he was a sexual assaulter. Wasn’t a criminal case, didn’t carry the risk of jail time, did have consequences.

        • blazera
          link
          fedilink
          -15 months ago

          In that case, the sexual assault had no consequences, it was a defamation case. Like it didnt involve him having to register as a sex offender or anything, because in the eyes of the law he isn’t one.