• HACKthePRISONS
      link
      fedilink
      05 months ago

      if they don’t explain their methodology, there is no reason to believe they got it right

      • Eager Eagle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        then there’s no reason to believe they got it wrong.

        also they’re vague estimates, even bitcoin has a huge margin for error.

        • HACKthePRISONS
          link
          fedilink
          -15 months ago

          there is every reason to not believe them. they clearly have a motivation to paint power consumption as worse than is true, and the complexity of extracting the use of dogecoin mining from the rest of the mergedmine is, personally, unfathomable. maybe i’m dumb and there is a simple calculation that can be done, but without evidence of their methodology, i’m not going to believe them, and no one should.

          • Eager Eagle
            link
            fedilink
            English
            45 months ago

            what’s the problem of estimating based on mined blocks and difficulty?

            • HACKthePRISONS
              link
              fedilink
              05 months ago

              it’s a bit like clocking your gas mileage to and from work, and then saying thats how much gas it took you to get out of your driveway.

            • HACKthePRISONS
              link
              fedilink
              05 months ago

              not everyone is merge-mining and even those who do may only be merge-mining specific chains.

            • HACKthePRISONS
              link
              fedilink
              -15 months ago

              the work that goes into mining those blocks should be discounted by the amount of energy that goes into mining every other merge-mined chain

              • Eager Eagle
                link
                fedilink
                English
                3
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                ok, so either ~1% figure already discounts this energy due to merge-mining, or it doesn’t discount and the effective energy consumption of Doge is lower. The original point remains: Bitcoin is pretty much the energetic problem of crypto, .

                • HACKthePRISONS
                  link
                  fedilink
                  05 months ago

                  asic miners are the problem with crypto’s energy consumption. nothing is wrong the the bitcoin protocol, which is functioning as expected.

                  • Eager Eagle
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    3
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    it’s just that PoW is trash when applied at scale for encouraging energy use to create consensus - and that’s by design - so indeed, “there’s something wrong with the protocol”.