(Having issues with the uploader, but I’m trying to add more images) Wait wait I think I got it old black and white shoes with green shoelaces

Yessss it works a delicate dog with fluffy hair that's pink ar the ends

I’m like a pro at this now a woman viewed from the back in a purple jacket, standing in a long grayscale hallway

Have this parrot to celebrate with me a close up shot of a parrot with bright blue feathers

  • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)English
    15•1 year ago

    I had similar moment a few days ago. I enabled NSFW posts on my account, and browsing All I noticed some AI porn community, “That’s gonna look hilarious!”, I thought, but no. It looked real. Unfortunately, it may lead people go generate porn they really shouldn’t.

    • pfr
      6•1 year ago

      What’s the name of this community? Asking for a friend

    • Spiracle
      3•11 months ago

      Sadly, the majority of AI-generated art on some bigger websites is of prepubescent children. Of those, far too many go for the photorealism style.

      Usually, I’d say people should just enjoy whichever art they want. With how close we are to being indistinguishable to actual photos, though, this raises some severe ethical concerns, in my opinion. I’m just waiting for a headline about some child trafficking rings mixing real photos into “art” or using the defence that those are definitely just generated images.

      Consistency is not quite there, yet. It’s far too close for comfort, anyway. I consider the above headline to be inevitable at this point, and that is depressing.