@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 5 months agoControversial benchmarking website goes behind paywall — Userbenchmark now requires a $10 monthly subscriptionwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square88fedilinkarrow-up1641arrow-down113cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1628arrow-down1external-linkControversial benchmarking website goes behind paywall — Userbenchmark now requires a $10 monthly subscriptionwww.tomshardware.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 5 months agomessage-square88fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish29•5 months agoI mean it’s kinda amazing that there’s someone looking at a 14th gen Intel CPU sucking back 200+ watts, while it gets spanked by a 7800X3D running at 65 watts, and thinking “AMD is hurting consumers”. That’s some next level shit.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish9•5 months agoWell said. The only thing hurting consumers is the reviewers omitting information or spreading misinformation.
I mean it’s kinda amazing that there’s someone looking at a 14th gen Intel CPU sucking back 200+ watts, while it gets spanked by a 7800X3D running at 65 watts, and thinking “AMD is hurting consumers”. That’s some next level shit.
Well said. The only thing hurting consumers is the reviewers omitting information or spreading misinformation.