Vice is basically dead — Thousands of stories written over the past two decades could soon be deleted without any warning::CEO Bruce Dixon told staffers that Vice Media will lay off hundreds of employees and stop publishing stories on the site.

  • Imgonnatrythis
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    The problem with paywalled isn’t an unwillingness to pay for quality, its being attacked with a subscription when we don’t want to be locked into a single source. Today I want a good article on popular particle physics, tomorrow I want to know whats going on with education in Nigeria. Let me make a quick crypto micropayment with no fuss and I’ll read your article, try to make me a lifelong subscriber and get fucked.

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      10 months ago

      Thank you. In an age where every single company is trying to wring $5-10/month out of you, sorry, I don’t have the budget to subscribe to 10 different news wires. Now if we had a system of 25-50 cents an article, maybe even $1, that would be an entirety different story. I don’t give two shits about sports analysis, what’s happening on Broadway in NYC, or celebrity gossip. I read my news a la carte. The only exception is my town’s weekly local newspaper, which I buy for $1 at the hardware store.

      • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        Chrome is looking into adding a website payment system, where you could have a refillable “tip jar”, and when you visit websites with paywalls they could pop up with the cost for that specific article. Hit yes, it deducts that from your tip jar, and you read the article.

        There are some similarities to a system that Brave browser already uses, except you generally earn money for brave’s version by allowing the browser to show you ads (although I’m pretty sure you can buy the credits directly too). Either way, the internet is moving towards needing to pay for content, and trying to find more convenient ways for users to do that.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m extremely skeptical of crypto but micro payments and donations seem like one of the most plausible applications for it since the infrastructure can be operated for basically free to receive money and there isn’t a large corporation taking a cut of every transaction unlike credit cards

        • Starbuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Which crypto network are you talking about that can be operated for free? PoW is expensive and wasteful, and PoS is pretty much back to a regular database again.

          At the end of the day here, this is a simple transaction ledger that doesn’t need to be turned into crypto, it just needs a party interested in moving the money around in these micropayments with minimal fees.

    • wosat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Exactly! Back in the day, you had two options: (1) subscribe or (2) buy a single magazine or newspaper. Now, there’s no equivalent to the newsstand for digital media.

      • hansl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think you can charge per article on substack. Not entirely sure though.

        Some newspaper charge X$ for Y articles, I think the NYTimes do it or used to. It’s usually a horrible deal compared to monthly subscription, but I think that’s the point.

      • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I mentioned this in another comment, but Chrome browser is currently working on it’s own implementation of this. It has a high chance of becoming the new standard with Chrome’s marketshare, unless there’s strong pushback against it (if Google made it a privacy nightmare or something like that).

        Brave browser has a version of this already, powered by crypto. Websites need to opt into it before they can earn money from users though, and it’s usually just used to replace revenue from brave blocking the websites ads.

      • Imgonnatrythis
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not successfully. Been talked about for decades though. Seems like an apt real world non silk-road use for crypto currency. No login required, just a quick wallet transfer for a few cents and access is gained. Quick and cheap enough that’s its not quite worth it to muck around with 12 foot ladders etc.

        • hansl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Companies were doing that with NFTs (which is what you’re describing) but now nobody want to touch an NFT so those companies definitely went bust.

          The best case will be companies who can hide the crypto behind the product, like “give us 5$ and we’ll give you 5 read-a-tokens which is totally not crypto btw”. Or wait a couple of years for crypto to come back in vogue.