• fartsparkles
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m honestly baffled this is a thing (but appreciate learning the condemning phrasing of “SSO Tax”).

    We implemented federated auth support for Entra, ADFS, and OIDC straight out the gate in our project. It’s just a base platform feature, regardless of tier. Charging for it would be like charging for MFA/2FA. I mean, it’s great for us. I’d prefer if everyone used the feature. What the utter fuck are some vendors thinking?

    • Shadow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Tell me about it. Github goes from $4 to $21 per user per month, and the only feature I want is sso.

    • RecallMadness@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      I suspect it’s a cost/capability/requirements thing.

      The larger the corporation, the more likely they’re going to have SSO as a minimum requirement. The more inflexible your customers are, the more you can charge.

      • rolaulten@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s more or less it.

        For example, I’ve got somewhere around 700 users. If we don’t have SSO (SAML preferred, oauth as a fall back, and good whiskey is required for ldap/ad) whatever your attempting to buy won’t pass review. Now Timmy the sales drone knows that, and so does their leadership - hence the SSO tax.

      • fartsparkles
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Entra’s free tier offers federated / SSO so basically every company with an MS license (which is an overwhelming majority, in my experience) can do SSO if they wanted to.