• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -34 months ago

    I like that we have to go back in time long before the southern strategy as if the Dems are a monolithic body. Just from a cursory first glance on Patriot act:

    the Act passed the House by a vote of 357–66, with Democrats comprising the overwhelming majority of “no”-votes.

    I won’t argue on SOPA because that is indeed contentious, but going back in time like that is really disingenuous.

    • @thecrotch
      link
      34 months ago

      I answered your question accurately. Instead of moving the goalposts after the fact, maybe you should ask a different question to begin with.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -34 months ago

        No goalposts were moved. You lied. Quick ten second Google search proved you wrong. You equivocated between the two as if they are both lock step voting the same on all legislation. Not only that, but you had to go back to W W 2 , long before the southern strategy was effected to back your claim.

        • @thecrotch
          link
          24 months ago

          You equivocated between the two as if they are both lock step voting the same on all legislation

          I did no such thing. You asked when they ever agree, implying that they never do, and I gave several examples of them agreeing on some pretty bad legislation. Maybe you’re confusing me with someone else. This was our first interaction.

          you had to go back to W W 2

          No I didn’t. SOPA and the DMCA were a few years ago. Patriot act gets renewed every few years with bipartisan support. KOPA is brand new. You’re latching onto the oldest example I gave because it fits your narrative and ignoring the others. Stop that. It makes you look like a dipshit.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            I misspoke. It’s expected that some bills will pass with bilateral support. It would be crazy if that never happened. The issue is the Dems are a big tent with many contrasting perspectives. The Gop is lockstep on almost every bill (except lately they are starting to fracture). What I was aiming to express is that overall, if I was to compare every bill pushed forward by the Democrats compared to their Gop counterparts, it would paint a very clear picture of where they diverge policy wise. That’s all.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              14 months ago

              The issue is the Dems are a big tent with many contrasting perspectives. The Gop is lockstep on almost every bill (except lately they are starting to fracture).

              The reason why the GOP is always lockstep is because they don’t allow self criticism within their party. This makes them legislatively powerful, but it also makes them prone to fascism.

              The reason we have to allow self criticism within the democratic party is because it is a big tent party. Without allowing politically disadvantaged groups within the party to point out its internal contradictions, the progressiveness party will stagnate. Instead its leadership will be consolidated with those who have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. Namely the older members whose idea of political progress is stuck the 90’s.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                04 months ago

                Everything you said is correct. I don’t mind criticism within the Democratic party if its constituents actually showed up to vote (in local or federal elections). The other side shows up regardless who’s on the ballot, as proven by the current frontrunner for the Gop. Meanwhile, Dems have to hold their noses tell each other how they’ll sit this one out because Biden is just not radical enough as the Trump’s cabinet guts the EPA and demolishes every institution and value. In four years Trump’s cabinet stacked almost all the lower circuit courts with republican judges. All these downstream effects from one administration have consequences.