• Imgonnatrythis
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    Agree these aren’t the people I want doing this, but are you saying we should tuck heads in sand and just not build robots?

    • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Agree with your comment. It seems most people are conservative about stuff like this due to fear.

      I personally want the AI and the cool robot stuff, without hesitation. Our problem (imo) is our current corrupt, exploitative capitalist system. We need regulation that protects the entire populace, not just the billionaire and corporate leadership class. All these advancements should absolutely be explored, but for the benefit of all, and protections for everyone.

      How we fix this though, I’m cynical. Which is why I respect people who are mostly afraid of the possible negative consequences.

    • coolmojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I want Rosie the robot from the Jetsons, who vacuums and does the ironing. Instead we will probably get the RoboCop and the Terminator.

      • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m sensing that were more likely to see robot cops (like from Elysium) than we are to see Rosie

        • Imgonnatrythis
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I think robot cops will be superior to human cops despite the movies. Some objectivity would be nice for a change.

          • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I’d imagine they’d be all objective and not emotional, just depends on their programming and who programs them

            • Imgonnatrythis
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Self defense is off the table, they never shoot first, code would need to be available to tax payer review.

    • cmbabul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      No, but there definitely should be a billion safeguards on it, and they should in no way be under the direct control of those already in positions of power

      • Imgonnatrythis
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Hard to build that many safeguards on something so new, safeguards need to develop with it. We’ve got asimov etc of course but thats not “billions”