• ironhydroxide
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    9 months ago

    “South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol on February 13 ordered his administration to develop tax incentives and subsidies for companies that encourage their employees to have children.”

    This seems fishy to me.

    Why not develop tax incentives and subsidies for the parents directly, instead of giving companies another loophole?

    • DarkGamer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      South Korea is run by a handful of enormous family owned companies. This is probably related to the fertility rate.

      • Rayspekt@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        9 months ago

        Small FYI: Those are named “Chaebol” in South Korea, if anyone want’s to look further into this.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        South Korea is run by a handful of enormous family owned companies

        As an American I can not relate to this at all since it so so fucking foreign

      • sadreality@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Don’t we have the same system in the US?

        This us pretty standard system across “west”

        • ironhydroxide
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Specifically in the us there are incentives for children on individual taxes. They aren’t huge, but they are direct from the government as a “child tax credit”

          If your employer decided to they could also give you “incentives”. This is not disallowed.

          But when/if the government gives incentives to companies to do the exact same thing that the government should be doing itself… means the government really just wants to pay the company, and not actually incentivise the people to have children.

          • sadreality@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            You mean 2k per year in child tax credit for some eligibale parents…

            Don’t spoil me so much daddy Sam!!!

            That covers like one month of day care lol

            I can’t tell if you making a good faith argument here tbh

            • ironhydroxide
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              It’s not an argument, it’s what is. Any incentive is still an incentive. The amount just reflects what value they put to said incentive.

              Now imagine they repealed that tax credit, and replaced it with corporate incentives to do the same thing. In this hypothetical, do you think the parents would actually get the same amount of benefit, or less?

                • ironhydroxide
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Aren’t you the one who claimed I wasn’t making a good faith argument?

                  It seems your only argument is “$2000/yr bad!!!” Care to elaborate on that?

                  • sadreality@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Korea provides more cash than that… Payments from 150 to 750 USD per month depending on age/situation.

                    US social policy is clown even vis a vis degeneracy like Korea. Don’t get me start on health care.

                    So I am not sure what your original point about the US giving child tax credit was for…

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      TBH I knew it was going to be something like this from the headline alone. Plutocrats never roll out this kind of thing without it somehow ending up in the hands of people who need it the least. Just like the USA’s Paycheck Protection Loans.

    • sadreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Because that’s how owner class wants it.

      Fuck peasants, they don’t get to leave the plantation ever.