• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Can I hear your fallout 2 rant anyway? I only played the modern ones, and nearly totally ignored the strategy involved in VATS in favor of just shooting enemies in the head myself.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Ha! Totally! Fallout 2 is an underrated gem of a game, the amount of content in a single city (new reno) is staggering. It’s funny, difficult, at times nonsensical, and arguably my favorite game in the series. Nothing about it is perfect, but it feels so right.

      I don’t want to give too many details in case i spoil it, but the game is really something else. I don’t think any game in the series has been as unhinged since fallout 2. It is 2d isometric and uses an action point system, so be aware of that, but man is it wild. I think new vegas is the closest to really capturing the essence, but there’s a certain tone that is missing from the new games. I also strongly dislike the nonstop shoot on sight gameplay in later entries like they’re copying call of duty.

      The first time i had an enemy offscreen one shot one of my party members with a Gauss rifle was a shock. An epic shock.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        Sheesh. I wasn’t expecting to hear ‘unhinged’, but if you’re saying it’s like the “wild wasteland” modifier in New Vegas that makes sense. Would you say the fights are more difficult than the fps ones?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 months ago

          I was a much less experienced gamer at the time, so I recall them being significantly difficult, but fun.

          Well, when I say unhinged I’m saying that the content was pretty wild, and the freedom you have to do some messed up stuff is fairly open.