• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    54 months ago

    So the 66% of the population who don’t vote for no particular reason at all are, “doing the right thing.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It’s functionally the same. All you’ve done is exclude yourself from the system just like what the majority of people do every cycle.

        • Sybil
          link
          fedilink
          -44 months ago

          that’s a consequentialist view of ethics, and one to which i don’t subscribe

            • Sybil
              link
              fedilink
              -14 months ago

              nonconsequentialist ethics are strongly preferred by professional philosophers, so someone here might be ignorant, but it’s not me.

            • @[email protected]M
              link
              fedilink
              -24 months ago

              Removed, rule 3:

              “Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        24 months ago

        No it isn’t. You’re not standing out or standing up. Nobody knows the difference why you stayed home and let Trump get elected.

        • Sybil
          link
          fedilink
          -24 months ago

          the individuals who abstained for moral reasons know.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            04 months ago

            And don’t affect change. You might as well never have been born, as far as your impact. So it sounds like this is actually only about your moral high ground. That’s cool. Means nothing when Trump is president. Brilliant plan.

                • Sybil
                  link
                  fedilink
                  14 months ago

                  it’s not to prove anything. as you said, I’m likely the only person who will know.

                • @[email protected]M
                  link
                  fedilink
                  14 months ago

                  To be clear, you’re not ENTIRELY wrong. But don’t attack other users. Removed, rule 3:

                  “Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (perjorative, perjorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (perjorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!”