Nemeski@lemm.ee to GamesEnglish · 1 年前Skull and Bones’ price has been slashed by $25 after less than three weekswww.videogameschronicle.comexternal-linkmessage-square46linkfedilinkarrow-up1198arrow-down17cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1191arrow-down1external-linkSkull and Bones’ price has been slashed by $25 after less than three weekswww.videogameschronicle.comNemeski@lemm.ee to GamesEnglish · 1 年前message-square46linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareParanomalylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·1 年前Interesting considering “record engagement.” I can’t imagine that was just a lie, was it?
minus-squaremomocchi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·1 年前It has an 8 hour free trial on pc so i imagine a ton of people tried it out. Engagement doesn’t have to equal enjoyment after all
minus-squareWooki@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前On point, it had a demo free to play before release and alot of people tried it out. Problem is it only has 8hrs worth of content.
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·1 年前It’s just the game that had more players check it out and get disappointed than any previous Ubisoft game.
minus-squareAurenkinlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 年前Maybe it was record low if they didn’t specify which kind of record.
minus-squareAlto@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前To be fair, a record low is still record engagement
minus-squareloobkoob@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前My interpretation is that it sold poorly, but that among the people who did buy it it’s got high retention.
Interesting considering “record engagement.” I can’t imagine that was just a lie, was it?
It has an 8 hour free trial on pc so i imagine a ton of people tried it out. Engagement doesn’t have to equal enjoyment after all
On point, it had a demo free to play before release and alot of people tried it out. Problem is it only has 8hrs worth of content.
It’s just the game that had more players check it out and get disappointed than any previous Ubisoft game.
Maybe it was record low if they didn’t specify which kind of record.
To be fair, a record low is still record engagement
My interpretation is that it sold poorly, but that among the people who did buy it it’s got high retention.