Appimages totally suck, because many developers think they were a real packaging format and support them exclusively.

Their use case is tiny, and in 99% of cases Flatpak is just better.

I could not find a single post or article about all the problems they have, so I wrote this.

This is not about shaming open source contributors. But Appimages are obviously broken, pretty badly maintained, while organizations/companies like Balena, Nextcloud etc. don’t seem to get that.

  • atzanteol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Package managers are fine. Walled gardens are not.

    • Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Absolutely. Luckily there are plenty of non-walled garden solutions on Linux, e.g. Flatpak.

      • Pantherina@feddit.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I mean, snap could also be not. Just somebody needs to write a wrapper that allows to download, verify etc. .snap packages from other repos.

        Shitty move of Canonical for sure.