The penalty is for preventing Spotify and other music streaming services from informing users of payment options outside the Apple app store.

The European Commission’s decision was triggered by a complaint by the Swedish music streaming service over this restriction and Apple’s 30% fee.

The EU competition enforcer said Apple abused its dominant position in the market for a decade.

Margrethe Vestager said, Apple had done this by "restricting developers from informing consumers about alternative, cheaper music services available outside of the Apple ecosystem.

  • Pasta Dental
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    As a seller, you can decide to sell on Walmart or on eBay if you want. On iOS you are forced to 1. Pay a yearly fee just to have the tools to build an app and 2. You are forced to use the App Store with all the restrictions that come with it.

    • oxjox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Regardless of the store, you’re still paying the retailer a fee to sell your goods. You’re also forced to abide by the restrictions of any store you’re selling in.

      There are always costs of doing business. I can’t think of anything other maybe standing in a “free” (taxpayer subsidized) open space and speaking your mind where you’re not paying someone something to conduct your business.

      How is it that people can justify Apple and Google doing all the work while getting paid nothing? It’s a ridiculous argument to suggest that this shouldn’t cost developers anything.

      As it is, the only thing Spotify is paying for is that $100/year (if I’m not mistaken) developer license. Spotify’s revenue for the last quarter alone was $4billon USD. I’m not arguing they should pay Apple billions of dollars but they should be paying them more than $100.