@[email protected] to

politics @lemmy.world • 4 months ago

‘Could there be two worse options?’: Undecided voters weigh in on 2024 election

-14

‘Could there be two worse options?’: Undecided voters weigh in on 2024 election

@[email protected] to

politics @lemmy.world • 4 months ago

‘Could there be two worse options?’: Undecided voter weighs in on 2024 | CNN Politics

CNN’s Gary Tuchman speaks to undecided voters in the swing state of Georgia about which candidates they support going into the 2024 presidential election.

The final question says it all.

Chat

Haus
link
fedilink
5•4 months ago
Clinton/Trump, for one. Although there are literally billions of answers.
- @[email protected]
  link
  fedilink
  5•4 months ago
  Every time Biden says or does something stupid, I try to take a moment to appreciate that at least we didn’t get Michael Bloomberg instead
- @xmunk
  link
  1•4 months ago
  Orban/Putin/Xi - with Xi threatening to split the authoritarian vote and be a king maker.

politics @lemmy.world

[email protected]

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• Business News

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

2.33K users / day
6.33K users / week
11K users / month
27.1K users / 6 months
18.1K subscribers
9.29K Posts
262K Comments
Modlog