• NeuromancerOPM
        link
        fedilink
        -24 months ago

        Can you show me where he was convicted? Must have missed that.

        • Grant_M
          link
          fedilink
          24 months ago

          He owes 91 million for defaming the woman he raped. You radicalized cultists are footing the bill. How can you miss this?

          • NeuromancerOPM
            link
            fedilink
            -44 months ago

            That isn’t a conviction. Do you not understand civil vs criminal court?

              • NeuromancerOPM
                link
                fedilink
                -44 months ago

                . I get you want to use new speak but words have meanings. It’s how we convey ideas. The jury specifically did not find him liable for rape. Even if they had, it’s not called a conviction.

                • Grant_M
                  link
                  fedilink
                  24 months ago

                  A jury found him liable. Then trump defamed his rape victim, twice. A jury found him liable for 5 million, then 81 million. Now he has defamed his rape victim again, and will be sued again. And you brainwashed cultists will pay off his crime bills AGAIN.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  14 months ago

                  Lmao, you didn’t use newspeak accurately. It involves the process of reducing available words.

                  Kinda like what your objective in that conversation is. Except that it still isn’t even close to the term you are trying to apply

                  • NeuromancerOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -14 months ago

                    The reduction is liable to convicted. That is a reduction of words. smh