• haui
    link
    fedilink
    -44 months ago

    I agree partially. They are competent rather than just able to do whatever cause money.

    Now if they invested their profits into workers salaries and made a bid for management salaries to only double per rank, we would be going somewhere.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      134 months ago

      Does Valve officially have managers now? Last I checked, they had this extremely flat structure of everyone being basically equal and people self-determining what they’re working on and how

      • haui
        link
        fedilink
        -114 months ago

        Thats what I heard as well, doesn’t change the fact that management gets paid 10-100 times of an engineer and profits go to the owner/s not the workers.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          104 months ago

          Are you talking about Valve, or generally? Because as I said, I don’t think there is such a thing as a generic manager role at Valve, much less one that gets paid so much more than other roles. How much of the profit goes to Gabe directly vs the employees or reinvested into the company I don’t know, but if you want to complain about compensation gaps, I’m very sure that Valve is absolutely not the company to start with.

          • haui
            link
            fedilink
            -34 months ago

            although valve is by no means the worst offender, they’re no angel either. Between raking in billions of dollars and taking no small cut from game developers (plus the fact that they take 100 $ just to put games on steam, even for free from what I read) they arent our savior by a long shot.

            FOSS is. We‘re seeing massive effort of people to democratize software development and it is glorious. So while I get that valve isnt an example for the worst of the worst, they still fit in „billionaire bad“.