• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      I think this covered it well:

      But overall most decisions were reasonable. The provider change and the change to the financial model were reasonable and will eventually lead to more profits, also with a smaller team behind the platform.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              61 year ago

              Wrong, stupid, and belligerent. The trifecta of incompetence.

              You should slap your father for not having the common decency to wipe you on the curtains.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          He slashed damn near 2/3 of the company, their HRIS systems were in disarray, they removed much of the force that made it advertiser friendly, came up with obscene API pricing (no doubt to try and cash in on LLM companies), and have failed to pay rent and server costs. Elon took a flawed business model and made it significantly worse all while giving a middle finger to their advertisers which is overwhelmingly their primary revenue source.

            • Tookys
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              @UserDoesNotExist

              @lps2 @technology

              Not to say his steps aren’t ones that should be taken, it’s the ways and means that alot of people are taking issue with.

              When he took over Twitter it was unprofitable, and the steps he’s taking are ones that would be recommended for alot of struggling startups. But not for a major buisness.

              Elon is used to moving quickly and breaking things often, as with a startup it’s fine if there are disruptions for a while or take years to become profitable.