• pelespirit
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 months ago

    None of the paperwork says what company he worked for, which is strange.

    • IllNess@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      I didn’t notice that. All documentation just refers to the company as “Company-1”.

      I’m guessing the company made a deal they would cooperate if their name isn’t included in.

      Not sure how accurate but I found someone with the same name and age in Marlton, NJ on Spokeo.

      His two cell phone numbers say “AT&T Mobility”. His landline says Verizon. I’m going to guess he worked for AT&T. Could be wrong though.

      • pelespirit
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        If it’s seems a little shady, probably AT&T.

    • hoshikarakitaridia@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Isn’t this also going into cyberattack / responsible disclosure territory? They might be opening themselves up to a class action with this.

      • pelespirit
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Right, I think the clients of the telecom company should know if someone was sim swapping their accounts. Then again, they might have already been told.

        • hoshikarakitaridia@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          If it’s only 5 that’s true. That said those 5 can file.

          Also I’m curious if there is another claim potentially in class action for all other clients whom thid wasn’t disclosed to…