What do you think about the points the authors makes?

  • @sugar_in_your_tea
    link
    44 months ago

    This is kind good reason to have optional namespaces in Cargo. The Rust team could have a “rust/” prefix or something with things that are considered to be a “standard library extension,” but supports versioning and all that. Some notes about that namespace:

    • never imports libraries outside its namespace
    • releases align with Rust releases where relevant
    • all new stdlib packages go through this namespace first
    • releases follow the same standards as a change to the standard library (semver for breaking changes instead of editions, maintenance of old major versions according to stdlib policy)

    This solves most of the problems a large standard library is intended to solve, while avoiding most of the downsides. Users only need to look in one namespace for “official” packages, so it’s similar to looking at the standard library (official Rust docs could even include them).