I have a 2010 Toyota Corolla. She’s been my trusty steed for the last 14 years and is in good working order. I recognize she won’t last forever, and if, god forbid (mostly for her) I get in an accident, I will need to get a new car. So what dumb cars do you drive, and what would you replace them with?

  • @LopensLeftArm
    cake
    link
    333 months ago

    When you say dumb, do you mean like with minimal computers? I think I remember reading about Mercedes or something working on a vehicle that’s entirely mechanical with zero computer integration. I imagine it would be pretty expensive though

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      273 months ago

      No way. Anyone have a link? Its gotta at least have electronic fuel injection. A 2025 Benz with a carburetor and old school distributor is not believable.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Mechanical injection diesels could work with no digital computer, but getting one through modern emissions tests in any countries with half a standard should be impossible.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      153 months ago

      For that, they’d have to develop an entirely new engine, which they then couldn’t sell in Europe, America, Australia or most of Asia due to emissions regulations. So maybe they’re doing it, but it will be a one-off prestige project at the end of the internal combustion engine age, and all of them will be put in museums or private collections.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        Maybe there’s just reusing an old OM601/602 from the 80s like diesel swappers are into.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      53 months ago

      If it’s a new car, I don’t think it will be legal for them to sell it in the US with all the new laws we’ve been getting that require “safety features” like the ability to remotely stop the vehicle.

    • wuphysics87OP
      link
      fedilink
      53 months ago

      I would prefer something old enough it wouldn’t even have a backup camera

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        Why? I wouldn’t go without a backup camera. It only takes one time for a small child running after a ball to slip your eye and you’ve got blood on your hands. When a driver gets behind the wheel, they are barely in control of a multi-ton murder machine. A backup camera is a very easy-to-use tool to keep the murder machine under control.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -23 months ago

          So staring at a tiny screen on your dashboard makes you less likely to hit a child that already would’ve gone unnoticed if you were actively looking in multiple directions with a wider field of vision?

          • BoscoBear
            link
            fedilink
            63 months ago

            Backup cameras have better visibility than you do from the drivers seat usually. That said, I would put in an aftermarket one rather than get a factory one.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            43 months ago

            You should always be looking behind you, checking mirrors, and checking the backup camera. I am a rookie driver and even I know that much.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              03 months ago

              Yes I know, my point is that not having a reversing camera forces you to look around. Every time I’ve been a passenger in a car with a reversing cam the driver has never checked their mirrors or looked behind them, they just trust that the reversing camera can see everything.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Oh, huh, I guess being in training just kind of forces me to think about good habits instead of getting lazy. I’m also more used to biking, where I have a mirror and shoulder glances as my primary tools. But either way, I would want to have the tool, since I know I will use it correctly.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            13 months ago

            Yes. The backup camera shows you the ground level, you still use the mirrors but kids and cats are not always tall enough to see in the mirrors. It’s an additional view, did you think it blacks out the mirrors or something?

          • Dandroid
            link
            03 months ago

            It’s just another tool. You wouldn’t only look in your passenger side mirror just because you have one. Use it along with all your other tools. Most standard cars have 3 mirrors and a backup camera. Most drivers also have necks they can turn.

      • Dandroid
        link
        13 months ago

        They became required because a dad backed over and killed his own son. That father fought for years to make them required so no one would have to go through the same pain he went through. Why would you not want one? You could not look at it if you don’t like it. But it’s one of the best possible safety features imo, and it’s dirt cheap compared to the cost of a car.

        • wuphysics87OP
          link
          fedilink
          03 months ago

          I agree with you from a safety standpoint. It’s not the backup camera itself. It’s the screen and all of the additional things that come with it that I don’t want. To me it’s an inflection point.

    • Dandroid
      link
      1
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Does it have no ABS, or VSC or traction control? That sounds like it’s only for enthusiasts, because the average driver is gonna crash (including me). Or is there a mechanic implementation for those?