• phario@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not having a good camera is a no go for me, unfortunately. It just seems the case that “ethical” manufacturers cannot compete with good cameras.

    • Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Didn’t read the article yet but I have read comments about lack of minijack somewhere else on lemmy.

      • Ticagrelor
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        More mega pixles does not mean more better. The actual sensor sensitivity and design are more impactful on image quality.

    • Chet Rockington 😐@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This one has a 25 MP front camera, which sounds like a good camera to me.

      Edit: It gets even better!

      On the back you’ll find a 48 MP main camera with OIS and a 48 MP wide-angle camera with a macro feature. The third circle on the back isn’t a camera; instead, it houses a laser autofocus system, color sensor, and a time-of-flight sensor.

      • phario@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s important to educate the public that more MP doesn’t mean better. More MP just means a larger sensor but it doesn’t mean anything regarding the optical lens quality.

        Here is a review https://www.dxomark.com/fairphone-4-camera-test/

        Despite the technology update, the Fairphone 4 does not come close to the category leaders Google Pixel 6 and Apple iPhone SE and occupies one of the lower spots in the DXOMARK Camera ranking for High-End smartphones.