• meat_popsicle
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    We’ll save money on out-of-control healthcare costs if the elderly just died instead of lingered. A tree needs to have the dead or dying branches pruned or they’ll endanger the trunk. The elderly are willing to sacrifice themselves for the economy; that’s what the Lt. Governor of Texas said during COVID.

    Not supporting this perspective, but I’ve heard social darwinists say “the weak should fear the strong” and other horrid shit unironically.

    • ANGRY_MAPLE
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      These types people always talk as if they’re immune to sudden, life-changing events. It’s all fun and games until some random a-hole hits you while driving drunk and makes you permanently disabled. Maybe you’re unlucky and have your entire city/neighbourhood burn down from an uncontrolled wildfire.

    • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know this type of scary talk. It also comes up when people talk about assisted suicide. Some people on the fringe believe it would be a good option for addicts, the homeless, etc.

      They believe it’s a rational standpoint. In reality they ignore the consequence this approach would have for our society on a psychological level.

      • Ataraxia
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I shoukd always have the right to choosing a comfortable death though. Otherwise I’ll have to go walk into the woods and hope mother nature isn’t cruel that day.