• RehRomano@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Nobody should be shocked to learn since the removal of the bike lane, the park has seen no extra parking revenue, fewer people cycling, and a 40% increase in drivers exceeding 50 km/h in the 30 km/h zone. Not only have they made the park less accessible, but also more dangerous. Let’s all remember this isn’t a bike lane on a four lane arterial, it’s a city park !!

    Just unbelievably incompetent work from ABC.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      this isn’t a bike lane on a four lane arterial

      I see where you say robbing a lane for motorized pedestrians is impactful on the capacity provided by the roadway. This kind of thing should be studied.

      • RehRomano@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not speaking to road capacity, I’m speaking to public controversy. A bike lane in a city park should be even less controversial and politicized than other roads.

  • Hadouken Shoryuken@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah shoot, I thought the bike lane was only temp closed due to some constructions when I was there duing the summer. Didnt expect it to be closed forever. Riding on that seawall path is kind a dangerous. Had to deal with ppl who thought it was 2 way lane when its only a 1 way, ppl stopping to take pictures.