• tias@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    So hire other bus drivers, or just have kids take the regular bus. Where I live there’s no such thing as a school bus.

    • Furball
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s impossible in almost all of the United States. There is no regular bus system in most of the country

        • Furball
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lots of the United States is quite rural, so a bus service would never be able to pick up all of those kids. Only school buses can since the school bus routes are specifically designed to pick the kids up where they are.

          • Moneo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            90% of Americans live in cities or towns, the percentage that aren’t driven to school is much much lower.

          • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If they don’t have a regular bus system that works then that’s what they need to start working on first. I’m convinced that it can be made to work if they are solution oriented instead of only looking for reasons why it won’t work and stopping there.

            Where I live, buses have dynamic routes. You go on an app to book a journey, then you get a time and place to be where the bus will pick you up (plus a drop-off point). It works for school kids as well as anyone else.

            • Furball
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Being solution-based still isn’t going to help kids who live miles from the nearest bus stop catch a regular bus. A complete reorganization of our towns and cities to have bus access for anyone might be nice, but then there’s the parents who really wouldn’t want their kids going on a public bus.

            • Resonosity@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              There are bus services in rural US where companies pick up people who’ve signed up. It’s not even a market problem at this point.

              People are just NIMBYs and averse to change, or at least the ones who show up to the local town council.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hiring takes time. It also required a lot more money than was budgeted because you need people who don’t have a 9-5. And lastly, not everyone lives in the city where there are buses.

      • Moneo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Buses can function fine in towns as long as the town is designed well. Very few people live in areas too rural for public transportation to function.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          as long as the town is designed well.

          Unfortunately I have to live in the real world where towns aren’t designed well. Besides, the average yard in my neighborhood is 3.5 acres so general purpose public transportation wouldn’t work either.

          • Moneo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Change happens iteratively. The first step is to acknowledge the problem and adjust how future development is planned. Start with the town center and move outward from there. Giving up fixes nothing.

      • Moneo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        It actually really is that simple. Design cities and towns so that kids can safely commute to school on their own and you’ve solved the problem.

        • Furball
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          What if, like in much of the country, they don’t live in a city or town?

          • Moneo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            90% of north Americans live in towns or cities. And no you don’t need a large population to support public transportation, here are hundreds of examples in Europe.

            • Furball
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Excuse me? My mother grew up in the countryside. Just because you’ve never seen a field before doesn’t mean you get to call other people uncivilized

              • Moneo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                100% agree please don’t attribute this person’s comments with the urbanist movement.

                Urbanists want cities & towns to be better places to live for everyone, we want to improve the finances of towns and people, we want to improve the health & quality of life of the average person. Urbanists do not hate anyone’s way of life or want to force them to live differently.

        • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Except it’s too late for that. The cities are already built. Fixing it would require tearing down entire cities and building new ones. Sure, you could do it one chunk of the city at a time, but doing just one city would take decades and exorbitant amounts of money.

          • Moneo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The Netherlands did it in the 70s and plenty of cities are progressively doing it. All you’re saying is, “we fucked our cities up, guess the only way forward is to double down.”

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          A small town is 10,000-50,000 people. Average home price is $300k. There are around 2,000 towns of 10,000-50,000. That’s $18,000,000,000,000 to build some of the small towns in the US to be public transportation friendly. Who gets dragged out of their homes to make room for rebuilding?

          And you’ll still have to problem that many people don’t want to live in crowded towns. Most people that like crowded cities are already living there.

          • Moneo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Plenty of towns that size are served well by public transportation in Europe.