“When I began trying to form a new claim by stitching together these parts in such an unnatural way, some called me mad.”

Image Transcription: XKCD Comics image

[A two-column table.]

  • [First row:]
    • [column “Claim”:]
      • [Open book. Left page says “F”, right page shows the monster labeled “?”. Arrow pointing to book says “by MS”.]
      • “No, the monster in Mary Shelley’s book is unnamed. Frankenstein is the doctor who created him.”
    • [column “Notes”:] This is the normal claim
  • [Second row:]
    • [column “Claim”:]
      • [Open book. Left page says “?”, right page shows the monster labeled “F”. Arrow pointing to book says “by MS”.]
      • “No, the monster in Mary Shelley’s novel is named Frankenstein.”
    • [column “Notes”:] Also common, and not worth getting mad about IMO
  • [Third row:]
    • [column “Claim”:]
      • [Open book. Left page says “MS”, right page shows the monster labeled “?”. Arrow pointing to book says “by F”.]
      • “No, Frankenstein is the name of the author. The monster Mary Shelley created is unnamed.”
    • [column “Notes”:] At a glance this could pass for one of the normal claims
  • [4th row:]
    • [column “Claim”:]
      • [Open book. Left page says “MS”, right page shows the monster labeled “F”. Arrow pointing to book says “by ?”.]
      • “No one knows who wrote the novel about Doctor Mary Shelley creating the monster Frankenstein.”
    • [column “Notes”:I would read this book
  • [5th row:]
    • [column “Claim”:]
      • [Open book. Left page says “F”, right page shows the monster labeled “MS”. Arrow pointing to book says “by ?”.]
      • “No, Frankenstein is the name of the doctor. The monster he created is Mary Shelley.”
    • [column “Notes”, merged with 6th row:] Fully chaotic
  • [6th row:]
    • [column “Claim”:]
      • [Open book. Left page says “?”, right page shows the monster labeled “MS”. Arrow pointing to book says “by F”.]
      • “No, the doctor who creates Mary Shelley in Frankenstein’s novel doesn’t have a name.”
    • [column “Notes”, merged with 5th row:] Fully chaotic

[Title text:] When I began trying to form a new claim by stitching together these parts in such an unnatural way, some called me mad.

  • drekly@lemmy.worldEnglish
    132·
    1 年前

    This is how Reddit began to feel. Everything I’d say would be responded to with a fully chaotic response.

    Then if I provided evidence and argued my original point, they’d get angry and tell me I was being a snowflake and being triggered by something so inconsequential as the author of a 200 year old book.

    No, I just want to set the record straight with evidence and facts while you’re spouting nonsense and muddying the waters of discussion without any evidence.

    It was usually about videogames too.