• Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Regulation would included licensing, training, drills, and organization.

    Nobody has proposed militia training, militia drills, militia organization. Gun owners have been opposed to “licensing”, but “licensing” is not a “militia” regulation, but a “gun owner” regulation. Require all members of the militia to become “licensed”, and we can talk.

    • blackstampede
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If all citizens are part of the militia then regulation of the militia is the same thing as regulation of gun owners. These are not two different groups of people, or two different types of regulation. When I say “licensing” I’m advocating essentially what any military does before they put a weapon in a soldier’s hands- training, and a record of that training, as a pre-condition to arming and deploying a soldier.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The two groups are not the same. “Militia” includes both gun owners and gun non-owners. You are attempting to impose rules only on gun owners. You cannot do that.

        You can establish training requirements, drill weekends, firearms proficiency standards on the militia, but not as a condition of owning guns. You cannot impose them on gun owners alone.